I wanted to watch this film when I saw the preview at the theater. The day-dream sequence, the scenery of Greenland and Iceland, and the backpacking part were very attractive to me. When I finally had the chance to watch it, I found the concept of this film too intentional.
I cannot deny that this film is very encouraging, with Life Magazine’s motto hanging on the wall of the office, which goes like “To see things thousands of miles away, things hidden behind walls and within rooms, things dangerous to come to, to draw closer, to see and be amazed.” Yet it is very similar to recent films like Eat, Pray, Love, telling people to embrace the world. I found that in recent years, Hollywood has continuously released this type of films, and they have started to become a genre. It is like urban people needs someone to tell them every year to get out of the place they live, to travel around, and to see things in the world. The idea of embracing the world is right (we should embrace the world every now and then, as a living entity), but saying it out loud too many times may sound nagging and too intentional. I started to wonder if the film company has cooperated with travel agencies to sell flight tickets.
However, apart from the seemingly obvious intention and some surreal plots (Walter rides a bike or skateboards to chase photojournalist Sean O’Connell, or jumps off a helicopter into the sea), there are still some parts of the film I like: day-dream sequences and natural scenery. When Walter “zones off", the film actually turns into different genres of film for the audience. It can be Matrix or Scott Pilgrim vs the World (when he fights with his boss on the road), Superman (when he jumps into the apartment and rescues a dog), and Romance movie (when he talks with Cheryl in the park), adding variety to the film. In addition, the zoning off sequence also paves the way for the comparison between the the real experience and the day dreams. Natural scenery is also a huge attraction for the audience in this film. Greenland, Iceland, and Himalaya may not be the travel spots constantly chosen by tourists, but the beautiful natural scenery the film captures in these places are very fascinating.
I find the main character Walter very comical and surreal: beside his zoning out sequences, the cost of the trip does not affect his life so much, and he can adapt to any kind of conditions, which in real life almost no one could do that without hesitation and practice. But except from all these, I think lots of viewers can relate to Walter very much as working for a firm for many years and the efforts are quite important but least appreciated. I will give this film 4 stars out of 5.